Back to Table of Contents
|
Lesson 15: Vocabulary Interlude 3 |
boóbin |
to braid |
||
dadem |
picture |
||
delith |
hair |
||
dith |
voice |
||
doni (Doni) |
earth, ground, soil (Earth, the planet) |
||
e... e |
either... or |
||
el |
to make |
||
esh |
boat |
||
éthe |
to be clean |
||
ham |
to be present; there is/are |
||
híya |
to be small |
||
mi |
leaf |
||
naya |
to care for |
||
oma |
hand |
||
thi |
to have |
||
thóo |
guest |
||
úuya |
to hurt; to feel pain |
||
zhe |
to be like; to be similar |
||
zho |
sound |
||
zhub |
insect |
Note the “there is/there are” aspect of the verb “ham.” When “ham” is used in this way, it is never pluralized; this means that if you need to specify that “there are” more than one thing, then you’ll need to find another mechanism for showing the plural.
The leaves are green, and the fruit is red. |
|||
The leaves are green, but the fruit is red. |
|||
The leaves are green or the fruit is red. |
|||
Either the leaves are green or the fruit is red. |
Note, in the third and fourth examples above, that “e” used singly (between two things) simply means “or.” It also can be used before each of the things to mean “either” the first “or” the second.
There is a sound. |
|||
There is a beautiful sound. |
|||
There are beautiful sounds. |
Note, in the third example above, “zho” is plural. This is expressed by pluralizing the verb “áya” that is relativized with “zho.” As noted above, “Ham” used in the “there is/there are” sense is not pluralized.
The little boat is clean. |
|||
The litte boats are clean. |
|||
The little boats are not clean. |
|||
Are the little boats clean? |
|||
|
|||
Who (plural) care for the Earth? |
|||
We care for the Earth. |
1 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
|
6 |
|
7 |
|
8 |
|
9 |
|
10 |
Note the lack of a Type-of-Sentence Word in #4 and #6. Because these are responses to #3 and #5, respectively, they will be statements by the nature of conversation—and they are signalled as such by starting with “ra” (no) and “em” (yes), respectively. As such, there is no need for the Type-of-Sentence Word; there is no danger of confusion.
In #5, if the “things” weren’t “beautiful”—or characterized by some other descriptor—we’d have no way (at least none we’ve seen yet) to indicate that there were more than one of them.
11 |
The bird will eat either fruit or grain. |
12 |
Margaret tried to help the old farmer. |
13 |
May wisdom cause peace! |
14 |
An aunt braids the hair. |
15 |
The grandson broke the container. |
16 |
The leaves are not fragrant, but the flower will be red and extremely fragrant. |
17 |
There was a clean insect. |
18 |
The busy worker will be present. |
19 |
Is the baker working or sleeping? |
20 |
Did the tired pigs feel pain? |
1 |
The woman had small hands. |
2 |
Will the parents care for the baby? |
3 |
Is the animal a strong horse? |
4 |
No, the animal is a furry cat. |
5 |
Are the beautiful things food? |
6 |
Yes, they are bread and fruit. |
7 |
They (many) are trying to make a boat. |
8 |
The door is like a window. |
9 |
The green grass is alive. |
10 |
The laughing helper understood Láadan. |
11 |
|
12 |
|
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |